Understanding Confusion Matrix in WEKA

Your past is a lesson. Not a life sentence. Forgive yourself and focus on the future. -Mel Robbins

Understanding Confusion Matrix in WEKA

In machine learning, a Confusion Matrix is a specific table layout that allows visualization of the performance of an algorithm. It is a key tool for assessing the quality of machine learning models, especially for classification tasks. In this blog post, we will dive deeper into what a confusion matrix is and how to interpret it in WEKA.

What is a Confusion Matrix?

Here’s a basic structure of a Confusion Matrix:

a b <--- classified as
x y |

For a binary classification (2 classes), the matrix can be interpreted as follows:

• a is the number of correct predictions that an instance is negative (True Negatives)
• b is the number of incorrect predictions that an instance is positive (False Positives)
• x is the number of incorrect of predictions that an instance is negative (False Negatives)
• y is the number of correct predictions that an instance is positive (True Positives)

For multi-class classification, the matrix expands to encompass all classes, but the principle remains the same: diagonal elements represent correct predictions, and off-diagonal elements represent incorrect predictions. The rows represent the actual class and the columns represent the predicted class.

Analyzing the confusion matrix gives insight not only into the errors being made by a classifier but also the types of errors that are being made.

Interpreting a Confusion Matrix in WEKA

Consider the following Confusion Matrix from WEKA:

a b <-- classified as
54 8 | a = A
23 1 | b = S

Here’s what each cell in the matrix represents:

• 54 (top left): True Positives for class A. These are instances that were correctly classified as class A.
• 8 (top right): False Negatives for class A (or False Positives for class S). These are instances that were incorrectly classified as class S but they are actually class A.
• 23 (bottom left): False Positives for class A (or False Negatives for class S). These are instances that were incorrectly classified as class A but they are actually class S.
• 1 (bottom right): True Negatives for class A (or True Positives for class S). These are instances that were correctly classified as class S.

From this, we can see that the classifier does a better job of identifying class A instances but struggles more with class S instances.

What Does Positive and Negative Mean?

In the context of a classification problem, the terms “positive” and “negative” are used to denote the two possible outcomes or classes. “Positive” could be used to represent a spam email and “negative” could be used to represent a non-spam email in a spam detection model. In a medical testing scenario, a “positive” result could mean the disease is present, while a “negative” result means the disease is not present.

In the case of model predictions:

• True Positives (TP): Instances correctly predicted as positive.
• False Positives (FP): Instances incorrectly predicted as positive.
• True Negatives (TN): Instances correctly predicted as negative.
• False Negatives (FN): Instances incorrectly predicted as negative.

Conclusion

A confusion matrix is a simple yet powerful tool for understanding how well a classifier is performing and where it’s making mistakes. By diving deep into each component of the confusion matrix, we can fine-tune our models to improve their performance and better meet our needs. Please note that you might have to adjust the format based on the platform you are planning

–HTH–